By In the timeless classic, “Forbidden Planet,” the brilliant scientist Morbius reveals a stunning secret to the senior officers of a ship that’s arrived to recue him—the technological wonders built by an extinct race of advanced alien beings: “Prepare your minds for a new scale of scientific values, gentlemen.” That same advice might be given by a Nobel laureate who’s reporting that DNA can be generated from its teleported “quantum imprint.” [” DNA waves and water”] Luc Montagnier was named the 2008 co-recipient of the Nobel prize for Medicine. He discovered that HIV causes AIDS. Now he claims solid evidence exists that DNA transmits electromagnetic imprints of itself into distant cells and fluids. A whirlwind of skepticism has greeted his assertion. The primary motivation for the negative response is quite simple: if Montagnier’s experimental evidence is valid it would uproot the foundations of several fields of science. Jeff Reimers, a theoretical chemist with the University of Sydney in Australia observed, “If the results are correct, these would be the most significant experiments performed in the past 90 years, demanding re-evaluation of the whole conceptual framework of modern chemistry.” Actually, Reimers is understating the importance. If Montagnier’s results are valid, his experiments would prove to be the most significant ever done in both chemistry and biology, perhaps physics as well. The reason? Montagnier’s experimental data also suggests that enzymes can mistake those quantum imprints for real DNA and then manufacture the real thing establishing a “quantum teleportation” of the DNA’s actual information. New Scientist published the results of the experiments and what they imply. The publication was swamped with outright disbelief and dismissal of the evidence. The science publication reports that they were contacted by a “Gary Schuster, who studies DNA conductance effects at Georgia Institute of Technology in Atlanta. [Schuster] compared it [the experiments] to ‘pathological science’ while a Jacqueline Barton, who does similar work at the California Institute of Technology in Pasadena, was equally skeptical: ‘There aren’t a lot of data given, and I don’t buy the explanation,’” she told New Science. The description of the experiment itself is incomplete. New Science begs off with the explanation that “Full details of the experiments are not yet available.” Yet what is available is, frankly, fascinating stuff. According to New Scientist “Two adjacent Category:Home › Other • Pomegranates: A newly discovered superfood • Where did the joke why did the chicken cross the road come from and why is it funny? • Can mothers diagnosed with bipolar disorder make good parents? • Spiritual evolution of human consciousness • Tips for getting a college basketball scholarship • Living with Pseudotumor cerebri (PTC) • Caring for the caregiver • Technologys impact on society
